Comments on: 30,000

By: celia

celia — Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:54:43 +0000

Great number! Isn’t it great to have a digital camera with no costs of as many pics as you want to take? lol…

By: celia

celia — Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:54:00 +0000

Great number! Isn’t it great to have a digital camera with no costs of as many pics as you want to take? lol…

By: Pappy

Pappy — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:11:11 +0000

How can I not give you a hearty huzzahh. As one who took a lot of film pictures, I have to say I think I did well but not to the t\une of 30,000. I had enough forethought to index and store my negatives but nothing like this. I hope mine are well organized enough that they won’t get thrown in the dumpster when I’m gone. Now if I could only get you to do 3D I would feel fullfilled.

By: Pappy

Pappy — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:11:00 +0000

How can I not give you a hearty huzzahh. As one who took a lot of film pictures, I have to say I think I did well but not to the tune of 30,000. I had enough forethought to index and store my negatives but nothing like this. I hope mine are well organized enough that they won’t get thrown in the dumpster when I’m gone. Now if I could only get you to do 3D I would feel fullfilled.

By: jo

jo — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:57:56 +0000

thanks for this post, i know it really resonates with me and my family. before we got a digital camera we hardly took any photos, and now we take tons! because i’m not scared of wasting film anymore, i’ve become a lot more experimental in the way i take pictures, and now i’m addicted to photography and getting a lot more serious about it.
you’re so right that it’s a great way to have an “everyday” visual record of family life.
and your photos are beautiful. i especially love the one of the roses in the window.

By: jo

jo — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:57:00 +0000